SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 453

ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Manisha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.K. Ray, Advocate, S.S. Adhikari, Advocate, M. S. Bhandari, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Alok Kumar Verma, J. - The applicant – accused Smt. Manisha has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash the impugned charge-sheet dated 29.04.2020, filed in FIR No.0627 of 2019, registered with Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, cognizance and summoning order dated 27.02.2021 and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.1617 of 2021, "State vs. Manisha", pending before the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar.

2. Subsequent to the submission of the charge-sheet, the learned Magistrate took the cognizance by the impugned cognizance order and summoning order was passed against the applicant – accused Manisha for the offence under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC.

3. The applicant Smt. Manisha and the respondent no.2, Lata Bisht, are present in-person. They are identified by their respective counsels.

4. Heard Mr. M.K. Ray, the learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. S.S. Adhikari, the learned Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondent no.1 and Mr. M.S. Bhandari, the learned counsel for the respondent no.2.

5. The applicant – accused Manisha, and,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top