SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 461

MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Rizwana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C. Joshi, Advocate, T.S. Phartiyal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. - Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 25.10.2021 passed by Joint Secretary, District Level Development Authority Haldwani, under Section 28(1) of Uttarakhand Urban and Country Planning Development Act. By the said order, petitioner has been directed to stop ongoing work of house construction.

2. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner started work of construction after obtaining necessary permission from the Competent Authority. Thus, according to him, the allegation made in the impugned order that, petitioner is raising construction without due permission of the Competent Authority, is unfounded.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that petitioner has already submitted a representation, in response to the impugned order, to the Competent Authority in District Level Development Authority Haldwani. Thus, he submits that the Competent Authority be directed to take decision on petitioner's representation expeditiously.

4. Since petitioner's representation against impugned order is pending, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Competent Authority in District Level Development Authority H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top