SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 255

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, Narayan Singh Dhanik, JJ.
Santosh Upadhyay & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 136 of 2020, 91 of 2019, Writ Petition (CRL) No. 333 of 2021
Decided On : 08-12-2021

Advocates Appeared:
D.S. Mehta, Advocate, J.S. Virk, Advocate, Prateek Tripathi, Advocate, C.S. Rawat, Advocate, Vikas Pande, Advocate

The central legal point established in the judgment is the violation of fundamental rights of prisoners, as guaranteed by the Constitution of India, and the State's constitutional duty to improve and reform the conditions of the jails.

Headnote:

Prison Conditions - State of Jails - Improvement and Reform - [Prison Conditions] - [Constitution of India, Article 21; State of A.P. v. Challa Ramakrishna Reddy and others, (2000) 5 SCC 712; T.N. Mathur v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1993 Supp. (1) SCC 722; Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi and others, (1981) 1 SCC 608] - The judgment discusses the horrifying conditions of jails in the State, the violation of fundamental rights of prisoners, and the State's constitutional duty to improve and reform the conditions of the jails. The court issues directions to the State Government to improve existing jails, construct new jails, provide sufficient budget for maintenance, modernize facilities, fill vacancies, and establish District Jails in districts without jails. It also constitutes a Committee to inspect jails, make recommendations, and submit necessary laws for the benefit of jail inmates. The State is directed to carry out the recommendations within six months and report progress monthly.

Fact of the Case:

The judgment highlights the deplorable conditions of jails in the State, including overcrowding, lack of medical facilities, unhygienic living conditions, and absence of educational and industrial facilities for prisoners. It emphasizes the violation of fundamental rights of prisoners and the State's failure to fulfill its constitutional duty towards the prison population.

Finding of the Court:

The court finds that the State has neglected its duty towards the jail inmates, leading to a violation of their fundamental rights. It emphasizes the need for immediate improvement and reform of the prison conditions to ensure the prisoners' right to live with dignity and honor.

Issues: The issues include the violation of fundamental rights of prisoners, overcrowding, lack of medical facilities, unhygienic living conditions, absence of educational and industrial facilities, and the State's failure to fulfill its constitutional duty towards the prison population.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision is based on the violation of fundamental rights of prisoners, as guaranteed by the Constitution of India, and the State's constitutional duty to improve and reform the conditions of the jails. It emphasizes the need for immediate action to address the deplorable conditions of the jails.

Final Decision: The court issues directions to the State Government to improve existing jails, construct new jails, provide sufficient budget for maintenance, modernize facilities, fill vacancies, and establish District Jails in districts without jails. It also constitutes a Committee to inspect jails, make recommendations, and submit necessary laws for the benefit of jail inmates. The State is directed to carry out the recommendations within six months and report progress monthly.

JUDGMENT

Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ. - In compliance of the order dated 17.11.2021, both Mr. Ranjeet Singh Sinha, the learned Secretary (Home), and Mr. Pushpak Jyoti, the learned Inspector General of Prisons, Uttarakhand, have joined this Court through video conference. Moreover, in compliance of the said order, Mr. C.S. Rawat, the learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand, has submitted an affidavit of Mr. Pushpak Jyoti, the learned Inspector General of Prisons, dated 06.12.2021. The same shall be taken on record.

2. By order dated 17.11.2021, this Court had directed the learned Inspector General of Prisons to visit the thirteen jails of the State, and to give his report along with photographs of each jail, as well as to provide this Court with his vision for improving and reforming the conditions of the jails in the State. Consequently, Mr. Jyoti, the learned IGP, has complied with the said order by submitting his affidavit.

3. A bare perusal of the affidavit, and especially of the photographs attached thereto, reveals a horrifying situation and conditions of the jails in the State. According to the said affidavit, District Jail, Haridwar, has a capacity of housing 870 prisoners. But, presently, 1400 prisoners are incarcerated in the said jail. Out of the said 1400 prisoners, 1335 are male prisoners living in twenty-three barracks. There are sixty-five female prisoners living in a single barrack. It is beyond anyone’s imagination as to how sixty-five female prisoners are living in a single barrack. Moreover, it is difficult to believe how fifty-eight male prisoners live and survive in each barrack. Surprisingly, despite the fact that there are sixty-five female prisoners, according to the affidavit, there is not a single gynecologist, who is attached with the prison. According to Mr. Pushpak Jyoti, as and when need arises, a gynecologist is asked to come and attend to the needs of the female prisoners. This is, indeed, surprising considering the fact that women would continue to have gynecological problems periodically, and yet the Government has not even bothered to attach a single gynecologist, or an obstetrician, in the medical faculty provided in the jail.

4. Similarly, the Sub-Jail Roorkee has a capacity of housing 244 prisoners. But, presently, there are 625 prisoners in the said Jail. Out of these 625 prisoners, 607 are male prisoners, who are housed in eight barracks, thereby meaning that seventy-five male prisoners are stuffed into each barrack. There are eighteen female prisoners, who are housed in a single barrack. This, itself, is surprising that eighteen female prisoners are forced to live in a single barrack. According to the chart provided in the affidavit, a Medical Officer is available on call. There is one Chief Pharmacist, and one Pharmacist, who is outsourced from the UPNL. For the female prisoners, a gynecologist is available, but only on call. Surprisingly, in the Sub-Jail, no prison industry is available, and no educational facilities are available to the 625 inmates of the jail. The photograph attached with the affidavit clearly reveals that all the prisoners are forced to sleep on floor. There are two photographs of the toilets available in the jail. The condition of one of the toilets is horrifying as the walls are all dirty, unpainted, and there is hardly any sense of hygiene. Similarly, even the kitchen operating in the jail is in a tin-shed. Firewood is being used for cooking food for the prisoners. Therefore, even the kitchen continues to exist in the 19th century. Despite the availability of bio-gas, or the availability of gas stoves, the kitchen appears to belong to another century.

5. Likewise, the capacity of the District Jail, Dehradun, is 580, while it houses 1491 prisoners. Out of these 1491 prisoners, 1404 are male prisoners. These 1404 male prisoners are housed in twenty-six barracks, thereby meaning that fifty-four prisoners have to be stuffed like sardines in a single b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top