JUDGMENT

S.K. Mishra, J. - Heard Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. In view of the order of this Court proposes to pass, no notice is required to be sent to the respondents.

3. In this writ application, the petitioner is has prayed for issuance of an appropriate direction for setting aside the order dated 12.10.2021 (annexure-3) passed by the learned Civil Judge (S/D), Vikas Nagar, Dehradun in Original Suit No. 120 of 2021 (Sahana Parveen vs. Narendra Kumar Sharma and another), whereby the learned Civil Judge (S/D), has refused to grant an ex parte interim injunction in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner has further prayed that appropriate directions may be issued for maintaining status quo with respect to the property in question, during pendency of the interim injunction application arising out of the aforesaid Original Suit.

4. In view of the order, this Court proposes to pass, it is not expedient to issue notice to the opposite parties at this stage.

5. It is apparent from the record that the petitioner is a lady, whose husband at present resides in Delhi because of medical exigency and the land is recorded in the name her father-in-law, but as per rep