SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 198

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
M/s Maa Shitla Trading - Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2400 of 2021
Decided On : 17-11-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Rajeev Singh Bisht, Advocate, T.S. Phartiyal, Advocate

The court emphasized the need for public hearing and stakeholder consultation in the process of considering applications for establishing stone crushers.

Headnote:

Stone Crusher - Establishment of Stone Crusher - The court directed the District Magistrate to consider the petitioner's application for setting up a stone crusher as early as possible, but not later than 12 months, and to conduct a public hearing for all stakeholders, including residents of the concerned village.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a direction to the respondents to immediately process the application for setting up a stone crusher at a specific location.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the District Magistrate to consider the petitioner's application within 12 months and to conduct a public hearing for all stakeholders before making a decision.

Issues: Prematurity of the writ petition in relation to the application timeline and the need for inspections and considerations before granting a license for establishing a stone crusher.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the petitioner's application as per the prevailing policy and directed the District Magistrate to ensure a public hearing for all stakeholders before making a decision.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate to consider the petitioner's application as early as possible, but not later than 12 months, and to conduct a public hearing for all stakeholders.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. - Petitioner wants to set-up a stone crusher at Village Kherni, Tehsil Betal Ghat, District Nainital for which purpose, he has made an application on 23.06.2021.

2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to the respondents to immediately process the said application.

3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that certain norms have been prescribed by the State Government for establishment of stone crushers, thus before granting licence to establish a stone crusher, inspections have to be made and various other aspects have to be gone into, to ensure that the stone crusher, upon establishment do not cause nuisance to persons residing in the locality. Thus, according to him, the writ petition is premature, as petitioner has applied only in the month of June, 2021 and has filed this writ petition within five months of his making application.

4. Be that as it may, since petitioner has moved an application, therefore, it has to be considered as per the prevailing policy.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to District Magistrate, Nainital to consider petitioner's application as early as possible, but not later than 12 months.

6. Before taking any decision on petitioner's application, District Magistrate shall give public hearing to all stake-holders, including residents of the concerned village, within six weeks. For this purpose, he may depute an officer, not below the rank of Sub-Divisional Magistrate.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top