SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 218

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Priya Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Gurmeet Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Piyush Aggarwal, Advocate, Soniya Chawla, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. - This judgment would govern the two Civil Revisions, being Civil Revision No. 83 of 2021, as well as Civil Revision No. 84 of 2021, which are listed today as fresh.

2. The prime question, which has been put to challenge by the revisionist, being aggrieved against the impugned order as it has been passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar; are emanating respectively from the Suit No. 107 of 2020, Gurmeet Singh Vs. Priya Sharma and others, and Suit No. 106 of 2020, Gurvinder Singh Vs. Priya Sharma and others, by virtue of which the application of the revisionist under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, to be read with Section 41(h) of the Specific Relief Act, has been rejected.

3. In fact, the revisionist had principally by filing the respective applications i.e. paper No. 17 (Ka1), in the two suits, referred above, had raised a preliminary ground that the suit, as instituted by the plaintiff/respondent would be barred by the provisions contained under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, for the reason being, that the issue about the subject matter of the suit, whether it falls to be within the domain and jurisdiction of the Re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top