SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 317

S.K.MISHRA
Seeto – Appellant
Versus
Jahoor Ahmad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajendra Singh Azad, Advocate, Mohd. Safdar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S.K. Mishra, J. - Heard Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Mohd. Safdar, the learned counsel for the respondents.

2. In this writ petition, the petitioners prayed for issuance of writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 27.01.2006, passed by the learned Commissioner, Garhwal Region camp at Dehradun in Revision No. 99 of 2000-01 and the order dated 17.08.2000 passed by the learned Additional Collector, Haridwar in Case No. 21 of 1998-99.

3. Petitioner no. 1 late Smt. Seeto and petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 were granted some agricultural lands for the purpose of cultivation for five years by the Land Management Committee of village Gee Mohmadpur Sayeedpur, Pargana Bhagwanpur, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar on the ground that they had undergone the family planning operation. The private opposite party no.1 and 2 have filed an application before the learned Addl. Collector, Haridwar for cancellation of their grant which was considered by the learned Addl. Collector, Haridwar and after examining the same it came to the conclusion that while granting the land for cultivation to the petitioners no survey was made by the Land Manageme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top