SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 638

MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Naveen Chandra Pathak – Appellant
Versus
R. Minakshi Sundaram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Lalit Samant, Advocate, Pradeep Hairiya, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. - Mr. Lalit Samant, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order dated 05.03.2018 passed by Writ Court in WPSS No. 1678 of 2011 has been complied with, inasmuch as, the only direction was to consider petitioners’ case for regular pay scale, which has now been considered by the Competent Authority and the same is rejected. He further submits that petitioners have challenged the rejection order by filing fresh writ petition.

2. In such view of the matter, the contempt petition is closed. Notice issued to the opposite party is hereby discharged.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top