SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 643

ALOK KUMAR VERMA
State Of Uttarakhand – Appellant
Versus
Bahadur Singh Rawat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pradeep Joshi, Advocate, Pooran Singh Rawat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ. - There is delay of 59 days in filing the present Appeal.

2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Delay Condonation Application (CLMA NO. 7068 of 2017), the delay is condoned. The Delay Condonation Application stands allowed accordingly.

3. Both the learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the issue involved in the present Appeal is already covered by the case of Uttaranchal Van Shramik Sangh Ranibagh Etc. vs. The State of Uttarakhand and Others SLP (C) Nos. 11651-11652 of 2019, decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court by its judgment dated 12.02.2020.

4. The issue before the learned Writ Court was whether the petitioners were entitled to receive the minimum of the pay-scale, and the Dearness Allowance admissible to the regularly appointed employees, or not?

5. By order dated 23.03.2017, the learned Single Judge directed the respondent-State "to pay and release the Dearness Allowance to the petitioners at par with the members of Kumaun Ban Shramik Sangh, Center at Ranikhet with effect from 21.03.2002 within a period of ten weeks from the date of the order with arrears". He further directed that "the petitioners shall

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top