SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 620

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Poonam Chaudhary - Appellant
Versus
Dnyaneshwar M. Mulay & Ors. - Respondents
Contempt Petition No. 347 of 2018
Decided On : 20-10-2021

Important Points

Compliance with a court order can lead to the closure of a contempt petition.

Subject

Civil Law - Contempt of Court

Headnote

Contempt - Compliance with Court Order - The court closed the contempt petition after the petitioner's counsel stated that the order had been complied with.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's counsel stated that the order passed by the Division Bench had been complied with.

Finding of the Court:

The court closed the contempt petition based on the statement made by the petitioner's counsel.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the petitioner's counsel's statement regarding compliance with the court order.

Final Decision: The contempt petition is closed, and the contempt notices issued to the respondents are discharged.

Advocates Appeared:
Kailash Chandra, Advocate, Gopal K. Verma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. - Learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the bar that the order passed by Division Bench of this Court has been complied with.

2. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition is closed.

3. Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top