IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Ravindra Maithani, J.
Bharti - Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Cri) No. 924 of 2021
Decided On : 22-07-2021
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sec. 302 – FIR under – Transfer of investigation – From police to CBI – Petitioner seeking for – Determination of – According to petitioner, she approached everyone in order to lodge FIR and despite communication having been received from Secretary, DLSA, the SSP, declined to lodged – FIR – SSP in her communication informs the Secretary, DLSA that Magisterial inquiry was underway – Before High Court she admit that Magisterial enquiry is no bar to lodge an FIR – High Court finds it is a case in which definitely investigation should be transferred to CBI – Court would also like to observe that it is a case where accountability of Senior Police Officer may also be required to be fixed administratively – Hence, High Court also proposes to make recommendation with regard to SSP, Nainital, Circle Officer, Haldwani and Guard who are posted at Sub-Jail Haldwani so as to ensure fair investigation – Direction issued.
(Paras 28 to 31)
Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk] 1860] /kkjk 302 & ds v/khu izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ & vUos"k.k dk vUrj.k & iqfyl ls lhñchñvkbZñ dks & ;kfpdkdrhZ pkg jgh gS & voèkkj.k & ;kfpdkdrhZ ds vuqlkj] og izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djkus ds fy, izR;sd ds ikl x;h Fkh vkSj lfpo Mhñ,yñ,lñ,ñ ofj"B iqfyl v/kh{kd us mldh lalwpuk esa lfpo Mhñ,yñ,ñ dks ;g lwfpr djrs gSa fd eftLVsªVh tk¡p py jgh gS & mPp U;k;ky; ds le{k og ;g Lohdkj djrh gS fd eftLVsªVh tk¡p izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djkus esa dksbZ o.kZu ugha gS & mPp U;k;ky; ikrh gS fd ;g ,d ,slk ekeyk gS] ftlesa vUos"k.k fuf'pr :i ls lhñchñvkbZñ dks vUrfjr dh tkuh pkfg, & U;k;ky; ;g izs{k.k djuk Hkh pkgsxh fd ;g ,slk ekeyk gS] tgk¡ ofj"B iqfyl vf/kdkjh dh tokcnsgh gh iz'kklfud :i ls fuf'pr fd, tkus dh vko';drk gS & vr% mPp U;k;ky; ofj"B iqfyl v/kh{kd] uSuhrky] {ks=kf/kdkjh] gY}kuh vkSj ml xkMZ ds lEca/k esa vuq'kalk djus dk izLrko djrh gS] tks midkjkxkj gY}kuh esa fu;qDr Fks ftlls fd fu"i{k vUos"k.k lqfuf'pr fd;k tk lds & funssZ'k tkjhA ¼izLrj 28 ls 31½
JUDGMENT
Ravindra Maithani, J. - Petitioner seeks transfer of investigation in the case arising out from FIR No. 261 of 2021, under Section 302 IPC, Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital from Police to Central Bureau of Investigation (for short, "CBI" ).
2. Facts necessary to appreciate the controversy, briefly stated, are as hereunder:-
The petitioner, on 03.03.2021, lodged a report under Sections 323, 504, 345 IPC and Section 9 read with 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, "POCSO Act" ) against her husband Pravesh Kumar, which was lodged on 03.03.2021 at 11:55 PM at reporting Police Chowki Kundeshwari, Thana Kashipur. Pursuant to this FIR, on 04.03.2021, Pravesh Kumar was arrested and lodged at Police Station. An entry was made to this effect in GD Report No. 30, at reporting Police Chowki Kundeshwari, Thana Kashipur. The report reveals that Pravesh Kumar was hale and hearty and he had no injuries. Pravesh Kumar was remanded to judicial custody on 05.03.2021 by the court of Additional District Judge/FTC/Special Judge, POCSO, Udham Singh Nagar. The remand sheet does not note any injury on his person. On 05.03.2021 at 04:29 PM, Pravesh Kumar was lodged at Sub-Jail Haldwani. Entry was made in Jail register at SL. No. 24. When he entered into Sub- Jail, Haldwani, he was also examined for COVID-19 and the report was "Negative" . On the same day, in the hospital of Sub-Jail, Haldwani, Pravesh Kumar was examined, but no injury was noted in his person. It was noted that he was "chronic alcoholic" . On 06.03.2021, in the hospital of Sub-Jail, Haldwani, in its OPD register at SL No. 164 an entry was made that Pravesh Kumar suddenly fell down on the ground and he was referred to Base Hospital, Haldwani. In the Base Hospital, Haldwani, Pravesh Kumar was taken, where in OPD Register at SL No. 29, it was recorded that he was brought dead. His post mortem was conducted. There were ten injuries on his person, which are as hereunder:-
"1 Bluish red contusion present over the back of left (LT) lower limb extending from the back of mid thigh to upper 1/3 RD of left leg measuring 40 cm X 30 cm; lower end 30 cm above the healsand upper end 20 cm from the gluteal cleft.
2. Reddish blue pattern contusion horizontally placed present over the left upper 1/3 RD of left leg, 6 cm below the popletial fossa and 25 cm from the heals, measuring 12 cm X 9 cm and showing one of the parallel contusion measuring 0.4 cm in width of each of the linear haemorrhages measuring with a gap of 1.8 cm.
3. On dissection of injury no. 1, 2 200 ml of thick clotted blood is coming out and all muscles of back of thigh and upper end of muscles of leg are diffusely contused with blood clots throughout.
4. Bluish red contusion present over the back of right thigh extending from mid-thigh to lower thigh measuring 11cm x 15 cm. On dissection of underlying muscle are diffusely contused.
5. A reddish abrasion present over left gluteal area measuring 4cm x 1cm.
6. A bluish contusion is present over the mid 1/3 RD of back of trunk, present over midline 21 cm above the gluteal cleft, measuring 5cm x 1 cm. On dissection underlying muscle is contused.
7. A bluish contusion present over the front of right of lower abdomen, measuring 2.5 cm x 2 cm, 10 cm from midline and 87 cm from heal. On dissection subcutaneous tissue is contused.
8. A bluish contusion is present over the sole of right feet measuring 1.5 cm x 2 cm, 2 cm below the greater toe.
9. A bluish contusion is present over the sole of right feet measuring 1.2 cm x 1 cm, 3 cm below the middle toe. On dissection of injury no. 8, 9 blood is extravassated over the underlying muscle.
10. A reddish brown scab abrasion present over the front of upper one third of left leg measuring 3.8 cm x 2.3 m."
3. The petitioner was informed about the death of her husband. She noticed injuries on the person of her husband. The injuries were not explained to her. According to the petitioner, on 13.03.2021, a Rahul
Arnab Ranjan Goswami vs. Union of India and others
D.K. Basu vs. State of West Bengal and others
Lalita Kumari and others vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others
Mehboob Batcha and others vs. State
Re-Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons
Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.