SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 609

NARAYAN SINGH DHANIK
Shaheena – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.A. Khan, Advocate, Atul Kumar Sah, Advocate, Kurban Ali, Advocate

JUDGMENT

N.S. Dhanik, J. - This Criminal Miscellaneous Application, under Section 482 CrPC, is preferred to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order dated 20.10.2020, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar in Criminal Case No. 903/2020, taking cognizance against the applicants for the offences under Sections 302, 304B IPC. Applicants have also prayed that the matter be re-investigated by a Special Investigation Team.

2. Facts, in brief, are that the respondent no. 3 lodged an FIR on 4.7.2020 stating that the marriage of Mr. Kashif (brother of the applicant no. 2) had taken place with Smt. Majida (niece of the complainant) on 8.2.2015. One son, namely, Master Adam was born out of the said wedlock. After the marriage, husband, mother-in-law, sisterin-law and brother-in-law of Smt. Majida used to harass her for the dowry and they were instigated by the maternal uncles of husband of Smt. Majida to kill her. On 3.7.2020, the deceased (Smt. Majida) accompanied with her husband came to the house of complainant and told him about the demand of dowry by the accused persons. Then the complainant and his brother gave rupees fifty thousand to Kasif and a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top