SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 686

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Rahul Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mohd Umar, Advocate, Lalit Miglani, Advocate, Lata Negi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - Instant writ petition has been filed for quashing of the FIR No.157 of 2021, under Sections 328, 376, 323, 498-A, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

3. Fir has been lodged by the respondent no.3, who is wife of petitioner no.1. The incident with regard to offence under Section 376 and 328 IPC, according the FIR were committed prior to the marriage between the respondent no.3 and petitioner no.1. The FIR further states that soon after marriage the respondent no.3 was treated illy, she was harassed, beaten and she was tortured.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent no.3 would submit that parties have amicably settled the dispute. Respondent no.3, the wife of petitioner no.1 is staying with him. They are happily married, living in a peace and harmony.

5. Petitioners Rahul Kumar, Rajendera, and Pushpa Devi and Radha alias Choti, who have been identified by Advocate Mr. Mohd. Umar and respondent no.3, Shama Abbasi alias Soniya, who has been ident

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top