R.C.KHULBE
Himanshu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.C. Khulbe, J. - This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist u/s 102 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection) of Children Act, is directed against the judgment and order dated 24.05.2021 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Haridwar in Bail Application No.6/2021, as well as the judgment and order dated 11.06.2021 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO), Haridwar in Criminal Appeal No.77/2021, Himanshu Vs. State.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. Learned Counsel for the revisionist as well as learned Counsel for the State admitted that the revisionist is a juvenile who is involved in connection with Crime No.195/2021 under Section 380/457/34/411 IPC registered at P.S. Bahadarabad, Distt. Haridwar.
4. The revisionist, being a juvenile, moved the bail application before the Juvenile Board Haridwar, which was rejected vide order dated 24.05.2021. Aggrieved by it, the revisionist preferred Criminal Appeal No.77/2021 before the Appellate Court, which was also dismissed vide judgment and order dated 11.06.2021. Hence this revision.
5. Admittedly, the revisionist was about 15 years at the time of the incident. From a perusal of the order passed by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.