SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 685

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
R.C.Khulbe, J.
Himanshu - Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand - Respondent
Criminal Revision No. 150 of 2021
Decided On : 09-07-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Narayan Har Gupta, Advocate, Shivangi Gangwar, Advocate

The main legal point established is that the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 entitles juveniles to be released on bail, except in specific circumstances, and the denial of bail should be based on proven grounds as per the Act.

Headnote:

Juvenile Justice - Bail Application - Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection) of Children Act - Section 12

Fact of the Case:

The revisionist, a juvenile, sought bail after being involved in a criminal case. The bail application was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board and the Appellate Court, leading to the current criminal revision.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the lower courts erred in not releasing the juvenile on bail, as the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 entitles juveniles to be released on bail, except in specific circumstances.

Issues: The main issue was the denial of bail to the juvenile based on the gravity of the alleged offence and the likelihood of the juvenile coming into association with known criminals.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the lower courts erred in law by not releasing the juvenile on bail, as the Act entitles juveniles to be released on bail, except in specific circumstances, which were not proven in this case.

Final Decision: The criminal revision was allowed, and the orders denying bail were set aside. The juvenile was granted bail with specific conditions, including custody by the mother and regular reporting to the concerned Probation Officer.

JUDGMENT

R.C. Khulbe, J. - This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist u/s 102 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection) of Children Act, is directed against the judgment and order dated 24.05.2021 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Haridwar in Bail Application No.6/2021, as well as the judgment and order dated 11.06.2021 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO), Haridwar in Criminal Appeal No.77/2021, Himanshu Vs. State.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. Learned Counsel for the revisionist as well as learned Counsel for the State admitted that the revisionist is a juvenile who is involved in connection with Crime No.195/2021 under Section 380/457/34/411 IPC registered at P.S. Bahadarabad, Distt. Haridwar.

4. The revisionist, being a juvenile, moved the bail application before the Juvenile Board Haridwar, which was rejected vide order dated 24.05.2021. Aggrieved by it, the revisionist preferred Criminal Appeal No.77/2021 before the Appellate Court, which was also dismissed vide judgment and order dated 11.06.2021. Hence this revision.

5. Admittedly, the revisionist was about 15 years at the time of the incident. From a perusal of the order passed by the Board, it appears that the sole ground, on which the bail was denied, is that the revisionist may again commit an offence. In the present case, the bail has been dismissed considering the gravity of offence alleged to have been committed by the revisionist.

6. Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 deals with bail to a child in conflict with law which reads as under:-

"12. Bail to a person who is apparently a child alleged to be in conflict with law.-

(1) When any person, who is apparently a child and is alleged to have committed a bailable or nonbailable offence, is apprehended or detained by the police or appears or brought before a Board, such person shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or in any other law for the time being in force, be released on bail with or without surety or placed under the supervision of a probation officer or under the care of any fit person:

Provided that such person shall not be so released if there appears reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring that person into association with any known criminal or expose the said person to moral, physical or psychological danger or the person's release would defeat the ends of justice, and the Board shall record the reasons for denying the bail and circumstances that led to such a decision.

(2) When such person having been apprehended is not released on bail under subsection (1) by the officer-in-charge of the police station, such officer shall cause the person to be kept only in an observation home in such manner as may be prescribed until the person can be brought before a Board.

(3) When such person is not released on bail under sub-section (1) by the Board, it shall make an order sending him to an observation home or a place of safety, as the case may be, for such period during the pendency of the inquiry regarding the person, as may be specified in the order.

(4) When a child in conflict with law is unable to fulfill the conditions of bail order within seven days of the bail order, such child shall be produced before the Board for modification of the conditions of bail."

7. A plain reading of Section 12(1) of the Act reveals that, any person, who is apparently a child, shall be entitled to be released on bail with or without surety or placed under the supervision of a probation officer or under the care of any fit person. The distinction between bailable or non-bailable offence has been done away with in respect of a juvenile. In other words, every juvenile is entitled to be released on bail except in circumstances where his/her release will bring him/her into association with any known criminal or expose him/her to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top