JUDGMENT

R.C. Khulbe, J. - This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist u/s 102 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection) of Children Act, is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.09.2020 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Dehradun in Bail Application Crime No. 187/2020, State Vs. Dilawar @ Sonu as well as the judgment and order dated 30.09.2020 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge/FTC/Special Judge (POCSO) Dehradun in Crl. Bail Appeal No.100/2020, Dilawar @ Sonu Vs. State.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. Learned Counsel for the revisionist as well as learned Counsel for the State admitted that the revisionist is a juvenile who is involved in connection with Crime No.187/2020 under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The revisionist being a juvenile moved the bail application before the Juvenile Board Dehradun, which was rejected vide its order dated 15.09.2020. Aggrieved by it, the revisionist preferred Criminal Bail Appeal No.100/2020 before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, which was also dismissed vide judgment and order dated 30.09.2020.

4. Admittedly, the revisionist was less than 18 years at the time of the incident. From a perusal o