R.C.KHULBE
Binttu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.C. Khulbe, J. - Since the revision is time barred, accordingly, delay condonation application (IA No.2/2021) has been moved. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the application seeking condonation of delay. Accordingly, delay condonation application is allowed and delay in preferring the present revision is condoned.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. Admit.
4. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist u/s 397 read with Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 24.01.2014 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ramnagar (Nainital) in Criminal Case No.508 of 2012, "Forest Range Officer Vs. Binttu" whereby the revisionist was convicted u/s 26(1) (e) of the Indian Forest Act and sentenced to undergo six months' R.I. with a fine of Rs.1,000/- and U/s 51 read with Section 2(16) (Ga), 9 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 to undergo one year's R.I. with a fine of Rs.5,000/-. The revisionist was also directed to pay Rs.5,000/- as compensation to the Forest Department as well as judgment and order dated 15.11.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.