RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Karam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ravindra Maithani, J. - The petitioner challenges the order of compulsory retirement dated 17.01.2020.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that in the month of July, 1995, he was appointed as Patwari (the Revenue Sub Inspector). Since the date of his appointment, he has been discharging his duties efficiently. As per the Recruitment and Promotion Rules prevalent and applicable, the promotional post of Patwari is Kanoongo (Revenue Inspector). On 07.11.2019, the petitioner was directed to join training of Kanoongo. He was relieved by the District Magistrate on 18.11.2019 for joining the training, which he joined at the Training Centre, Almora. The training was for a period of three months, which was to come to an end on 15.02.2020.
3. It is further the case of the petitioner that pursuant to the Government Order dated 20.02.2020 and 24.07.2019, a Screening Committee was constituted, which on 18.11.2019, in paragraph 8 of its report, considered the case of the petitioner and recommended that the petitioner should not be compulsorily retired and should be allowed to continue beyond 50 years. But again, suddenly, on 17.01.2020, the petitioner was compulsorily retired without givin
Arun Kumar Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand and another
Baikuntha Nath Das vs. District Medical Officer
Baldev Raj Chadha vs. Union of India
D. Ramaswami vs. State of T.N.
Nisha Priya Bhatia vs. Union of India and another
State of Gujarat vs. Umedbhai M. Patel
State of Orissa and others vs. Ram Chandra Das
Surendra Singh Negi (since deceased) & others vs. State of Uttranchal & others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.