SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 548

RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Sharukh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vinod Sharma, Advocate, M.S. Bhandari, Advocate, J.S. Virk, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Alok Kumar Verma, J. - The present Habeas Corpus Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of habeas corpus, directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar, respondent No. 2, and the Station House Officer, Police Station-Kotwali Roorkee, DistrictHaridwar, respondent No. 3, to produce the corpus of Sahrukh, the petitioner, who has been illegally detained by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, in Case Crime No. 787 of 2019, registered with Police Station-Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, for the offences under Sections 8,22, 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act, 1985").

2. Brief facts of the present case are that on 15.12.2019, at about 20:40 hours, one thousand illegal Buprenorphine injections, a commercial quantity, were recovered from the personal search of the petitioner, conducted in the presence of the Circle Officer of Police, a Gazetted Officer. The petitioner was arrested. After completion of investigation, a charge-sheet was filed against him.

3. Heard Mr. Vinod Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. J.S. Virk, the learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Ut

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top