JUDGMENT

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral). - The revisionist/tenant has approached this Court, exercising the revisional jurisdiction under Section 25 of The Provincial Small Cause Courts Act of 1887, whereby he has questioned the impugned judgment, as had been rendered, by the court of 4th Additional District Judge/Judge, SCC on 22.05.2013, by virtue of which, the SCC suit no.05 of 2003, as was preferred by the landlord/respondent was decreed, and as a consequence thereto, the effect of the judgment and decree, was that the revisionist was directed to vacate the disputed premises and to handover the vacant and peaceful possession, along with the arrears of rent and the damages at the rate as directed therein in the judgment of 22.05.2013.

2. The brief facts, which emerges for consideration in the present SCC revision are that the landlord is shown to have issued a notices under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, whereby the landlord had expressed her intention of terminating the tenancy of the revisionist/tenant from the tenement in question, which constitutes to be the part of and the portion of the property, which was then bearing municipal no.156-B, Rajpur Road, Deh