MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Dayanand Siksha Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
Sri Prem Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioner is challenging the order dated 24.07.2017 passed by Assistant Collector, Ist Class (Sadar), Dehradun, in summary proceedings, under Section 33/39 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901. He is also challenging the judgment dated 21.09.2017 passed by Commissioner, Garhwal Division, whereby his revision, challenging the order passed by Assistant Collector, was dismissed.
2. It transpires that respondent nos. 1 to 6 moved an application, under Section 33/39 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, contending that their forefathers were joint tenure holders in respect of land in question, however, after the Fasli Year 1373, names of their forefathers have been omitted from the Annual Register, therefore, the Annual Register be corrected. The said application made by the private respondents was allowed by Assistant Collector, Ist Class on a report submitted by the concerned Lekhpal (Revenue Inspector). Petitioner, who was not party to the proceedings under Section 33/39 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, filed a revision under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, contending that the erstwhile State of Uttar Pradesh had acquired land comprised in Village Rangadwala and Village Mitthibedi, Par
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.