ORDER

1. The respondent No.3 is a plaintiff in a Suit, which was instituted on 18th September, 2014, in which, the petitioner, is the defendant No.3, who was impleaded subsequently by the Court's order, on 17th October, 2015. The plaintiff/respondent No.3, in the Suit had modulated the decree, which was sought from the Court below; in the following manner :-

^^v& ;g fd }kjk LFkk;h fu'ks?kkKk izfroknhx.k dks fuf’k/k fd;k tkos fd os oknh dh iV~Vs'kqnk lEifRr lhekafdr okni= ftlesa oknh dk iq[rk fuekZ.k gqvk gSA fLFkr lqeu ekxZ] dLck dksV}kj] ijxuk o rglhy dksV}kj] ftyk iksMh xढoky ij dksbZ Hkh uo fuekZ.k voS/k :i ls fdlh Hkh izdkj dk vius }kjk ;k vius losZUV ;k ,stsUV }kjk u djsaA o dksbZ dk;Z ,slk u djs ftlls fd lEifRr iV~Vs'kqnk ij oknh ds vf/kdkj izHkkfor gksaA

c& ;g fd }kjk vkns'kkRed fu"ks?kkKk izfroknhx.k dks vknsf'kr fd;k tkos fd os fu/kkZfjr le;kfof/k] tks U;k;ky; }kjk fuf'pr dh tk;s] ds vUnj lEifRr fookfnr ij ls viuk dCtk o n[ky gVk dj dCtk o n[ky oknh dk djk nsa vU;Fkk izfroknhx.k ds [kpZ ij }kjk vehu vnkyr dCtk o n[ky oknh dk djk;k tkosA

l&;g fd mn~/kks"k.kk bl vk'k; dh Qjek;h tkos fd okni= esa fn;s x;s vk/kkjksa dh fcuk ij rFkkdfFkr clh;r fnukafdr 05-04-1990 ,d tkyh] QthZ] dwV