SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 110

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ K. TIWARI, J.
Anus and others – Appellants
Versus
Senior Superintendent of Police & others - Respondents
Compromise Application No. (I.A. No. 1 of 2022) In Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 1087 of 2022
Decided on : 10-06-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Kuldeep S. Rawal, Mr. Ravinder Kumar Verma, Advocate

The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a settlement between the parties and the nature of the offenses, following the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court.

Headnote:

Compounding - Criminal Law - The court allowed the quashing of the FIR and all proceedings emanating from it, based on the settlement reached between the parties and the nature of the offenses, following the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Narinder Singh & others Vs State of Punjab & another.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought quashing of F.I.R. No. 0352 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504 I.P.C., Section 3 (1) (D) & 3(1) (GH) of S.C./S.T. Act, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Civil Line, District Haridwar, based on a settlement reached between the parties.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the quashing of the FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom, considering the nature of the offenses, the settlement reached between the parties, and the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court.

Issues: Quashing of F.I.R. and criminal proceedings based on settlement and nature of offenses.

Ratio Decidendi: The possibility of the trial resulting in conviction was considered remote and bleak due to the settlement, and continuation of criminal proceedings would visit the accused with great oppression, prejudice, and injustice. The court also considered the broad guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in similar cases.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and F.I.R. No. 0352 of 2022, along with all proceedings emanating therefrom, was quashed. The compounding application was disposed of accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought quashing of F.I.R. No. 0352 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504 I.P.C., Section 3 (1) (D) & 3(1) (GH) of S.C./S.T. Act, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Civil Line, District Haridwar.

3. A compounding application, jointly signed by counsel for respondent no. 3 and counsel for the petitioners has been filed duly supported by affidavits of petitioner no. 3 and respondent no. 3 (complainant).

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have entered into settlement, therefore, the matter needs to be compounded.

5. Learned counsel for respondent no. 3 submits that dispute has now been amicably settled between the parties, therefore, his client wants to close the matter to ensure that peace is restored.

6. Petitioners and respondent no. 3 (complainant) appeared before this Court, who are duly identified by their respective counsels.

7. Parties present in Court also made a statement that in view of the settlement, they want to close the matter.

8. Learned State Counsel submits that offences under Section 147, 148 I.P.C. and Section 3 (1) (D) & 3(1) (GH) of S.C./S.T. are non-compoundable, however, in view of law laid down by Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, the same can be compounded with the leave of this Court. He further submits that all the offences are punishable for less than seven years.

9. Having regard to the nature of offence and also considering the broad guidelines issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs State of Punjab & another reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466, request of the petitioners deserves to be acceded to.

10. Since the parties have entered into a compromise, therefore, possibility of the trial resulting into conviction of the accused is remote and bleak and, that being so, continuation of criminal proceedings would visit the accused with great oppression, prejudice and injustice. Rather, it would tantamount to abuse of process of law. Ends of justice would be met if criminal proceedings are put to an end, because this would allow the parties to translate their decision to live in peace in the reality. The only consideration for the compromise reached between the parties seems to be their desire to burry the hatchet for all times to come. Resolution of a dispute by way of a compromise between two warring groups, therefore, should attract the immediate and prompt attention of a Court which should endeavour to give full effect to the same unless such compromise is abhorrent to lawful composition of the society or would promote savagery.

11. In view of above discussion, the writ petition is allowed. F.I.R. No. 0352 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504 I.P.C., Section 3 (1) (D) & 3(1) (GH) of S.C./S.T. Act, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Civil Line, District Haridwar, is hereby quashed along with all the proceedings emanating therefrom.

12. Compounding application is, accordingly, disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top