JUDGMENT :

This Court feels it apt, to begin this judgment with the following concise aptitude of the petitioner, to litigate upon a recovery proceedings for recovery of public money initiated against her.

2. This could be said to be the best example, where a litigant for the reasons best known to her had played with the jugglery of the judicial proceedings, despite of the various false pretext and statement being placed before the writ courts as apparent from the order sheet of the writ petition, just to buy time to honour the loan liability, which could be termed as to be a conscious abuse of the process of the law court.

3. The brief facts of the case are that in the year 1987, the petitioner has contended, that a Society was registered under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act, under the name and style of the “Jan Jagran Samiti”. The society, thus, constituted in accordance with its objective, which was the basis for registration, and in accordance with the objectives provided therein in its bye laws, under which it was registered. It is contended by the petitioner that its object was women empowerment, health education, leprosy eradication, rehabilitation and environ