SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 123

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
Jitendra Singh Bisht and others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 198 of 2019
Decided On : 08-04-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Vinay Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Narain Dutt, Brief Holder, Mr. N.S. Pundir.

Headnote:

Recruitment - Government Order - Uttarakhand Subordinate Education (Trained Graduate Category) Service Rules, 2014 - Rule 15(6) - Government Order dated 30.10.2006 - Select List - Quashing of Government Order dated 21.12.2018 - Direction to continue recruitment process - [Recruitment] - [Uttarakhand Subordinate Education (Trained Graduate Category) Service Rules, 2014, Rule 15(6), Government Order dated 30.10.2006] - The Court quashed the Government Order dated 21.12.2018 and directed the respondents to continue the process for recruitment of the Assistant Teacher (LT Grade) pursuant to the advertisement dated 23.02.2014.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the Government Order dated 21.12.2018, which stopped the recruitment process for Assistant Teacher (LT Grade) initiated pursuant to the advertisement dated 23.02.2014. The petitioners argued that the process was wrongly aborted and that there were still vacancies to be filled.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found the Government Order dated 21.12.2018 to be arbitrary and without any reasonable cause, and therefore quashed it. The Court directed the respondents to continue the recruitment process within six months, forwarding the select list as per the provisions of Rule 15 of the Rules.

Issues: The issues included the validity of the Government Order dated 21.12.2018, the availability of vacancies, and the compliance with recruitment rules.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the Government Order dated 21.12.2018 was arbitrary and without basis, and that the process for recruitment should be continued as per the advertisement dated 23.02.2014. The Court also emphasized the need for the select list to be forwarded in accordance with Rule 15 of the Rules.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, the Government Order dated 21.12.2018 was quashed, and the respondents were directed to continue the recruitment process for Assistant Teacher (LT Grade) pursuant to the advertisement dated 23.02.2014 within six months.

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

The challenge in the instant petition is made to the Government Order dated 21.12.2018, by which, the process for recruitment of Assistant Teacher (LT Grade) initiated pursuant to the advertisement dated 23.02.2014 has been stopped. The petitioners have also sought other directions for conducting counselling/verification of documents against the advertisement dated 23.02.2014.

2. The facts necessary to appreciate the controversy briefly stated are as follows. The respondent no.5, Uttarakhand Technical Education Board (for short, “the Board”) invited applications by an advertisement dated 23.02.2014 for appointment to the post of Assistant Teachers (LT Grade). The selection was to be conducted on 3089 vacancies. 10% horizontal reservation was made available to the candidates claiming the benefit of Uttarakhand Rajya Andolankari. It was subject to the final outcome of the Writ Petition (PIL) No.67 of 2011. The petitioners applied in response to the advertisement. A Written Examination was conducted by the Board. The Board declared result on 18.04.2016 on all vacancies in different subjects except the vacancies, which were earmarked under 10% horizontal reservation for Uttarakhand Rajya Andolankari. The selected candidates were invited for documents verification on various dates. After verification, the candidates were recommended. In all, 10 times this exercise was undertaken as hereunder:-

Sl. No.

Document Verification

Date

Number of Candidates invited

Number of candidates selected

1.

Round 1

22.04.2016 to 25.04.2016

2370

2045

2.

Round 2

23.08.2016 and 24.08.2016

311

236

3.

Round 3

10.01.2017 and 28.03.2017

110

59

4.

Round 4

03.04.2017 and 17.04.2017

323

216

5.

Round 5

26.05.2017

34

24

6.

Round 6

11.01.2018 and 12.01.2018

165

110

7.

Round 7

28.06.2018 to 30.06.2018

305

183

8.

Round 8

06.09.2018 and 07.09.2018

138

74

9.

Round 9

08.10.2018

64

35

10.

Round 10

05.12.2018

29

11

3. It may be noted that initially the process for documents verification was not done with regard to the vacancies earmarked for the Uttarakhand Rajya Andolankari. This Court in its judgment passed in Writ Petition (S/S) No.398 of 2015, Manish Rawat vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, declared the horizontal reservation in favour of the Uttarakhand Rajya Andolankari as un-constitutional and ultra vires. Pursuant thereto, by a public notice dated 28.06.2018, the process for documents verification was also undertaken for the remaining 10% vacancies, which were otherwise earmarked for the Uttarakhand Rajya Andolankari. It is thereafter, the documents verification process started from the 7th round onwards (from 28.06.2018 onwards).

4. The petitioner no.1 had applied for the post of Assistant Teacher (LT Grade) Maths; the petitioner no.2 applied for the post of Assistant Teacher (LT Grade) Science and the respondent no.3 applied for the post of Assistant Teacher (LT Grade) General Subject. They had secured 114.75, 105.75 and 100 marks respectively in their corresponding subjects. It is admitted case of the parties that after first documents verification report, the cut off marks reduced so as to call other candidates for documents verification.

5. It is the case of the petitioners that the Board did not make recommendation against all the advertised vacancies but, has made recommendation in piecemeal manner only against the vacancies, for which, suitable candidates were found. Suddenly, by virtue of a Government Order dated 21.12.2018, the process for recruitment of the Assistant Teachers (L.T. Grade) pursuant to the advertisement dated 23.02.2014 has been stopped. According to the petitioners, they are next in the list below the last selected candidates; the Government Order dated 21.12.2018 is not su

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top