IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.
Gaurav Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1936, 1937, 2413, 2122 of 2019
Decided on : 20-04-2022
Educational Qualification - Appointment Dispute - Uttarakhand Technical Education Department (Non-Gazetted Technical) Service Rules, 2008 - Appendix-II - Diploma in Computer Application - B.Tech. Degree in Computer Science & Engineering - Supreme Court interpretation of higher qualifications
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner participated in a selection for the post of Computer Programmer/cum Operator, was initially declared successful, but was later excluded from the final select list. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking appointment and challenged the rejection of his representation for appointment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's B.Tech. Degree in Computer Science & Engineering did not compensate for the lack of a recognized Diploma in Computer Application, which was an essential requirement for the post. The court also cited a Supreme Court judgment to support the interpretation that possession of a higher qualification does not necessarily make one eligible for a post requiring a lower qualification.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner's B.Tech. Degree in Computer Science & Engineering could compensate for the lack of a recognized Diploma in Computer Application, which was an essential requirement for the post of Computer Programmer/cum Operator.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that as per the Uttarakhand Technical Education Department (Non-Gazetted Technical) Service Rules, possession of a recognized Diploma in Computer Application was a mandatory requirement for the post, and the petitioner's B.Tech. Degree did not fulfill this requirement. The court also relied on a Supreme Court judgment to emphasize that possession of a higher qualification does not automatically make one eligible for a post requiring a lower qualification.
Final Decision: The writ petitions were dismissed, and the petitioner's claim for appointment was rejected, as the court found that the petitioner did not meet the essential educational qualification criteria for the post.
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties
2. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in these writ petitions, therefore are being taken up together and are being decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of WPSS No. 1936 of 2019 are being considered.
3. Petitioner participated in a selection held by Uttarakhand Subordinate Service Selection for the post of Computer Programmer/cum Operator and was declared as successful. Petitioner appeared before the selecting body for document verification, however, his name was not included in the final select list published on 19.06.2018. Petitioner, thereafter, filed writ petition, which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 29.04.2019. Operative portion of the said order is reproduced below:
4. Pursuant to the said order, petitioner made a representation, which has been rejected by Additional Chief Secretary, Technical Education Department, Government of Uttarakhand vide order dated 19.07.2019. Feeling aggrieved by rejection of his claim for appointment, petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:
ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Computer Programmer-cum
Operator in the Technical Education Department.”
5. Petitioner contends that since he possesses B.Tech. Degree in Computer Science & Engineering in addition to one year Diploma in Computer Application, therefore, he could not have been non-suited for appointment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even if the Diploma possessed by petitioner is ignored, then also petitioner is eligible for appointment by virtue of possessing B.Tech. Degree in Computer Science & Engineering, which is higher than Diploma in Computer Application. The qualification needed for the post in question i.e. Computer Programmer/Operator is given in Appendix-II to the Statutory Rules known as “Uttarakhand Technical Education Department (Non-Gazetted Technical) Service Rules, 2008, which is reproduced below:-
Appendix-II
| Sl. No. | Name of Post | Essential Requisite Qualification | Age limit |
| 11. | Computer Programmer/Operator | Bachelor and recognized Diploma in Computer Application of minimum one year from Govt. of India/State Govt. Or Recognized Diploma in any discipline of Engg. And Recognized Diploma in Computer Application of minimum one year from Govt. of India/State Govt. | 21-35 years |
6. From the Appendix-II of the relevant recruitment Rules, it is apparent that, for appointment to the post in question, one should have Bachelor’s Degree in any branch with Diploma in Computer Application of minimum one year duration and such Diploma should be recognized by Central/State Government. Besides the above qualification, a person with Diploma in any discipline in Engineering with recognized Diploma in Computer Application of minimum one year duration, is also eligible for appointment to the post in question. There is no dispute regarding validity of B.Tech. Degree in Computer Science & Engineering po
Zahoor Ahmad Rather and others v. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.