JUDGMENT :

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

Before dealing with the factual backdrop of the case and particularly in the light of the arguments which has been extended by the counsel for respondent no.1, this Court is of the view that in order to better answer the questions raised by the counsel for the petitioner. Precise law as governing the field is required to be dealt with. There are two parallel revenue laws, which are being taken in support of his argument by the counsel for the petitioner to argue the matter. The first being the provision of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter to be called as U.P.Z.A & L.R. Act). To deal with the aspect covered by the said Act in fact, the provisions of the U.P. Z.A. & L & R Act, are a special statute, which has been framed by the State governing the management, regulations and devolvement of rights over an agricultural land as defined under the Act and the Act, that is why the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, has been placed in the Xth Schedule of the Constitution as framed under Article 31-B of the Constitution of India and it finds its entry at Serial No.11.

2. Article 31-B of the Constitution of India provides for a va