SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 76

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Apurva Jindal – Appellant
Versus
Sukhvinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Monika Pant.
For the Respondent:Mr. J.C. Karnataka, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Shivanand Bhatt.

JUDGMENT :

The petitioner before this Court, is a landlord, who has put a challenge to the impugned Appellate Court’s judgment, as it has been rendered by the court of 1st Additional District Judge, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Rent Control Appeal No.11 of 2017, "Sukhvinder Singh Vs. Apurva Jindal", by virtue of which, the appeal preferred by the respondent/tenant, herein, was allowed, and as a consequence thereto, it had resulted into the setting aside of the order of the release dated 10th October 2017, as passed by the Prescribed Authority/Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kashipur, District Udham Sing Nagar, in the proceedings, which was registered as a PA Case No.6 of 2017, “Apurva Jindal Vs. Sukhvinder Singh”, under Section 21 (1) (a) of Act No.13 of 1972.

2. The precise case of the landlord in the release application was, that the respondent happens to be under the tenant of the petitioner over the tenement in question, which was described as to be a residential accommodation lying in Mohalla Katoratal Ramnagar Road, Premdeep Hotel, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. The “chaudahai” of the property under the tenancy of respondent was described in the release applicat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top