SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 705

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Appellant
Versus
DEVRAJ – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, A.G.A. with Ms. Lata Negi, Adv.
For the State : Ms. Gurbani Singh, Amicus Curiae

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Instant appeal is preferred against the Judgment and Order dated 08.07.2003, passed in Sessions Trial No.484 of 1999, State vs. Devraj under Section 307 IPC and Sessions Trial No.485 of 1999, State vs. Devraj, under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short, “Arms Act"), by the court of 4th Fast Track Court/Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar (for short, “the case").

2. By the impugned judgment and order, the respondent Devraj (hereinafter referred to as “the accused") has been acquitted of the charges under Section 307 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act.

3. Facts briefly stated are that, on 25.05.1998, when PW1 Dhanpal Singh was asleep in his Ghair (a kind of courtyard). Suddenly, at 03:00 AM, he woke up and found that the respondent Devraj, the accused was standing near his cot holding a country made pistol in his hands. The DW1 Dhanpat Singh questioned the accused, at which, the accused fired at him. But, fortunately, the country made pistol could not fire. The informant raised alarm. Thereafter, Vijaypal, Dhanpat and other villagers came and apprehended the accused. From his possession, a country made pistol and a cartridge were rec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top