R.C.KHULBE
JAGDISH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble R.C. Khulbe, J.
Since the revision is time barred, accordingly, delay condonation application (IA/2/2021) has been moved. Notices were issued to the private respondent but despite personal service none appeared on behalf of him. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the application seeking condonation of delay. Accordingly, delay condonation application is allowed and delay in preferring the present revision is condoned.
2. Heard.
3. Admit.
4. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist u/s 397/ 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 10.09.2012 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ramnagar, District Nainital in Criminal Case No.1385 of 2011, State Vs. Satnam Singh @ Sonu & Others, whereby the learned trial Court convicted the revisionist under Section 147 IPC and sentenced him to undergo six months' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.200/- with default stipulation and also convicted U/s 332 IPC and sentenced him to undergo one year's R.I. with a fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulation, as well as against the judgment and order dated 04.08.2017 p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.