SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(UK) 497

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
VIMAL KUMAR DHAUNDIYAL – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMAR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners being aggrieved against the Revisional Court's order dated 22.12.2015 by virtue of which the Revisional Court, had while setting aside the order dated 03.10.2015 as passed by the Court of Civil Judge (J.D) Pauri Garhwal in Misc. Case No. 18 of 2009 “Jagat Narayan Dhaundiyal and others vs. Ritha Ram and others" has remitted the matter back to the Trial Court and to issue a fresh Parwana in the name of the Survey Commissioner, who was directed to submit his report afresh within one month before the Trial Court for which he was directed to be paid with the remuneration of Rs. 1,000/-. For the said purpose by the impugned order dated 22.12.2015 the revisionist was directed to take steps within a period of 03 days before the Trial Court and participated in the proceedings before the Trial Court for the conduct of the Survey Commission, which reads as under:

“ORDER

This Civil Revision is allowed. The impugned order dated 03.10.2015 is set aside. The case is remanded back to the Trial Court. Parwana in the name of survey commissioner next in the list be issued who will submit his report

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top