JUDGMENT :

Since the controversy involved in this bunch of civil revisions is same, therefore, for sake of convenience, these revisions are being heard and decided together with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

2. CLR Nos.36 of 2022 and No.44 of 2022 have been preferred by the revisionist/defendant against the orders dated 20.04.2022 passed by Civil Judge (S.D.) Kotdwar, Pauri Garhwal in O.S. No.19/2017 and O.S. No.21/2017 respectively, whereby the applications moved by the revisionist/defendant under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint have been dismissed.

3. CLR Nos.120 of 2022 and No.121 of 2022 have been preferred by the revisionist/defendant against the orders dated 08.08.2022 passed by Civil Judge (S.D.) Kotdwar, Pauri Garhwal in O.S. No.19/2017 and O.S. No.21/2017 respectively, whereby the applications moved by the revisionist/defendant under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment in written statement have been dismissed.

4. Factual matrix of the case is that the respondents/plaintiffs filed two suits for a decree of specific performance against the revisionist/ defendant in the Court of Civil Judge (S.D.), Kotdwara, Pauri Garhwal. The revisionist/defend