PANKAJ PUROHIT
Satish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.
1. This C482 application is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.02.2015, passed by learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Revision No. 105 of 2014, Satish Kumar vs. Ajay Kumar Singh and Others, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge while rejecting the criminal revision affirmed the judgment and order dated 05.10.2013, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Case No. 163 of 2012, Satish Kumar vs. Ajay Kumar Singh and Others, whereby the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar while accepting the Final Report No. 6 of 2012, dated 30.03.2012, submitted by the Investigating Officer took cognizance against the applicant-Satish Kumar under Section 182 IPC, on the recommendation, so made by the Investigating Officer and issued summons to the applicant to face the trial fixing a date of appearance on 31.10.2013.
2. The facts, which resulted into filing of the present C482 application, in short, are that the first information report was lodged by applicant-Satish Kumar on the basis of which, a chick FIR was lodged in Police Station SIDCUL Rudrapur, District Udham S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.