JUDGMENT :

The challenge in this revision is made to the order dated 18.01.2022, passed in Misc. Release Application No. 17 of 2023, State of Uttarakhand Vs. Bablu, by the court of First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar. By it, the release application filed by the revisionist has been rejected.

2. It appears that the vehicle Registration No. UP 25 DQ 6738 was taken into custody by the Police in connection with FIR No. 05 of 2023, under Section 8/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (“the Act”). The revisionist claiming himself to be the registered owner of the vehicle filed an application for the release of the vehicle which has been rejected by the impugned order.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. Learned counsel for the revisionist would submit that the revisionist is a registered owner of the vehicle. He is ready to furnish the security and he will produce the vehicle as and when required.

5. Learned State counsel would submit that if the revisionist is registered owner of the vehicle, on production of the documents, the vehicle may be released in favour of the revisionist.

6. The impugned order does