PANKAJ PUROHIT
Sangrammu Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The present criminal revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.05.2013, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Rudraprayag in Criminal Appeal No.02 of 2011, “Sangrammu Lal and Ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand”, whereby, the judgment and order dated 28.01.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-First Class, Rudraprayag, in Criminal Case No. 79 of 2010, “State Vs. Sangrammu Lal and Others”, convicting the revisionists/accused persons under Sections 147 and 323 of IPC, was upheld and the appeal filed by the revisionists/accused persons was dismissed.
2. The revisionists/accused persons were convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate-First Class, Rudraprayag under Sections 147 and 323 of the IPC and were sentenced to undergo six months’ rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/- each under Section 147 of IPC, with default stipulation, one month additional simple imprisonment each and
3. The brief facts of this case are that complainant-Tej Singh and the accused persons are the residents of same village. On 31.07.2006, complainant Tej Singh had filed a complaint against the accused persons Sangramu Lal, Chhota Lal, Indra Lal, Kunwar Lal and Smt. Jasoda
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.