PANKAJ PUROHIT
Vijay Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This Criminal Revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.05.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ranikhet, District –Almora in Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 2009 “Vijay Ram Vs. State of Uttaraskhand”, whereby, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ranikhet affirmed the judgment and order dated 25.03.2009 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ranikhet in Criminal Case No. 820 of 2001 “State Vs. Vijay Ram”, whereby, the revisionist-accused was convicted under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304-A IPC and was sentenced Rs. 500/- as fine in each of the offence under Section 279, 337, 388 IPC and two years rigorous imprisonment under section 304-A IPC and fine of Rs. 500/- with default stipulation that if the fine is not paid, will have to undergo 4 months additional simple imprisonment.
2. As per the case of the prosecution, a first information report was lodged against the revisionist-accused in Police Station–Ranikhet by informant Bharat Bhushan S/o Dol Singh (PW-1) with the allegations that the informant was the resident of Village–Sauni (Devlikhet); according to informant he boarded the bus no. U.P. 02B-7025 of KMOU for going to his village;
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.