VIVEK BHARTI SHARMA
Raghav Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Chandra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.
Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner against the judgment and order dated 30.01.2023 passed by 2nd Additional District Judge, Haldwani in S.C.C. Revision No. 04 of 2019, whereby the said court dismissed the revision and affirmed the judgment and order dated 30.01.2019 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haldwani in S.C.C. Suit No. 11 of 2015.
2. Heard.
3. Admit the petition.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners/tenants would submit that the respondent/landlord filed Suit No.11 of 2015 against the petitioners/tenants for ejectment on the grounds of non-payment of rent and also making material structural alterations in the tenanted property without taking permission in writing from the respondent/landlord; that, the Small Causes Court, Haldwani vide judgment and order dated 30.01.2019 (annexed as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition) observed that the petitioners/tenants have deposited the entire rental amount before the trial court, however, gave the benefit of Section 20(2)(c) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (in short ‘the Act No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.