JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

Since both these revisions arise from the common judgment and order, they are being decided by this common judgment. Parties shall be referred to as they are arrayed in CRLR No. 386 of 2021.

2. The challenge in these revisions is made to common judgment and order dated 23.10.2021, passed in Criminal Case No. 196 of 2017, Smt. Pooja Sharma and another Vs. Sharad Sharma, by the court of Judge, Family Court, Haridwar (“the case”). By it, the respondent no.2 (hereinafter referred to as, “the respondent”) has been directed to pay Rs.25,000/- per month, as interim maintenance to the revisionist no.1 wife and Rs.15,000/- per months, as interim maintenance to the revisionist no.2 the minor daughter (Total Rs.40,000/- per month, as interim maintenance).

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. The revisionists filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which is basis of case, seeking maintenance from the respondent Sharad Sharma on the ground that after marriage, she was harassed and tortured. She is not able to maintain herself, whereas the respondent has means. It has been objected to by the respon