JUDGMENT :

(Ravindra Maithani, J.) :

The challenge in this revision is made to the order dated 30.09.2023, passed in Case No. 186 of 2022, Smt. Radhika Goyal Vs. Mayank Garg, by the court of Judge, Family Court, Haridwar (“the case”). By it, the revisionist has been directed to pay Rs.25,000/- per month as interim maintenance to the respondent.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. The respondent has filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code”), which is the basis of the case. According to the respondent, she and the revisionist were married on 28.10.2020, but after the marriage, the revisionist did not establish any physical relationship with her. The respondent was harassed and tortured for the dowry and other reasons. The respondent also stated that the revisionist had a relationship with the servant in the family, due to which, the servant had left thrice. According to the respondent, finally she was expelled from her matrimonial home on 28.02.2023. She is not able to maintain herself, whereas, the revisionist gets Rs.2,50,000/- per month, as he is a distributor and has a major business house. He is inc