BHUTT, SEN
GYANIRAM – Appellant
Versus
GANGABAI – Respondent
( 2 ) THE appellant Gyaniram for self and as guardian of his son Babulal, respondent no. 2 executed a simple mortgage bond, dated 2-1-1936, for Rs. 6,999 in favour of Chhotelal, since deceased, father of respondent No. 1, Gangabai. Interest agreed was 11 annas p. c. p. m. with yearly rests. The mortgage debt was said to have been taken for meeting the marriage expenses of Babulal who was then a minor. Chhotelal instituted the suit, out of which this appeal arises against gyaniram and Babulal for recovery of Rs. 9,795-5-0 inclusive of interest. The suit was contested by Babulal who denied execution of the mortgage bond and legal necessity for the debt, A preliminary decree for sale for the full amount, with costs and future interest, was, however, passed against both the defendants on 29-111941, and the amount due, which was found to be Rs. 11,547-12-0 was made payable on or before 29-5-1942 with interest at 6 p. c. p. a. from the date of suit, namely, 15-2-1940, till 29-5-42 and thereafter at 4 p. c. p. a. till realisation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.