SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(MP) 56

BHUTT, SEN
DHIRAJKUNWAR – Appellant
Versus
LAKHANSINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.SHRIVASTAV, R.K.Pandey

( 1 ) THIS is defendants' appeal from the decree of the First Additional Civil Judge, class I, Bilaspur, in Civil Suit No. 2-A of 1950, by which a deed of gift Ex. P-9 dated 16-4-1949, executed by Mst. Bhirapkuar, appellant No. 1, in favour of dwarkaprasad, appellant No. 2, has been held to be not binding on the plaintiff-respondent, Mannoolalsingh, now represented by his sons and widow, respondents 1 (a), (b), (e) and (d ).

( 2 ) PRITHISINGH, the propositus of the family, left behind four sons, Chaitsingh, bhawarsingh, Kanwal-singh, and Nawalsingh. Bhawarsingh was married to Mst. Akalo from whom he had a son, Tikaftsingh, who died on 24-4-1984. Tikaitsingh held -/8/- share of village Karwa, which, on his death devolved upon his widows, dhirajkuar and Champakuar, -/5/-village share being mutated in the name of dhirajkuar and -/3/- in that of Champakuar. Champakuar, however, remarried and left the family sometime in the year 1938 and consequently her -/3/- village share reverted to Dhirajkuar.

( 3 ) KANWALSINGH left behind two sons, Manpoo-lalsingh, the plaintiff, and Tiloksingh, father of appellant No. 2, Dwarkaprasad, Mannoolalsingh was the son of his legally married wife. Tiloksi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top