SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(MP) 38

DIXIT
BANSIDHAR NARAYANJI – Appellant
Versus
E. B. SUKHIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.D.PATEL, Malgava

DIXIT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition to Revise the decision of the Additional District Judge, Indore, reversing in appeal an order of the Additional City Civil Judge of Indore refusing to stay, under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, a suit filed by the plaintiff applicant for recovery of damages on account of breach of contract. The learned Additional district Judge stayed the suit under Section 34, Arbitration Act, for a period of four months.

( 2 ) THE undisputed facts are that the suit was filed on 26th April, 1952. On 23rd june 1952 Mr. Patel filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the defendant praying that as the defendant resided outside the State, further time may be granted for filing his reply. This prayer was allowed by the trial Court fixing 26th August, 1952, as the date for the filing of defendant's reply. On this date the defendant non-applicant presented an application under Section 34, Arbitration Act, for the stay of the suit stating chat one of the terms of the contract between the parties was that all matters, claims and disputes arising in respect of the terms and the conditions thereof, were to be settled by parties in Indore by reference to the sole arbitration of








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top