DIXIT
FIRM DEOCHAND PANNALAL – Appellant
Versus
SHUBHKARAN SHIVDEOJI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a petition to revise an order of the second Additional District Judge, indore, rejecting the objection of the applicants that ant application for execution of a decree against them filed by the non-applicant Shubhkaran on 15th March, 1951, was not maintainable inasmuch as the decree had been attached by Messrs. Khemji Punja and Co. , Bombay, in execution of their own. decree against shubhkaran. The precise objection raised by the applicants in the lower Court, and negatived there was that the non-applicant had not obtained the leave of the court making the attachment.
( 2 ) BEFORE me Mr. Tayal learned counsel for the applicants, urged that under the order of attachment of the decree in question issued on 6th October, 1951 by the additional District Judge, Indore to the Court of the District Judge, Indore, the execution of the decree was stayed until the court of the Additional District Judge, indore which passed the decree in favour of Messrs. Khemji Punja and Co. , cancelled the notice requesting the stay of execution or until the holder of the decree sought to be executed, namely Messrs. Khemji Punja and Co. , applied to the Court to execute the decree; an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.