SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 26

NEVASKAR
STATE – Appellant
Versus
GULABRAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.R.Khanvilkar, J.D.PATEL

NEVASKAR, J.

( 1 ) THE accused in this case is a cyclist peon in the engineering section of the indore Municipality.

( 2 ) THE case put up against him by the Anti-Corruption Department was that he, on 28th August 1952 obtained Rs. 100/- by false representation from one Ganpat mali, representing himself to be a Municipal Inspector. He was, therefore, put up for trial before the Special Judge, Indore under Sections 161 and 420, I. P. C. The learned Special Judge decided after full trial that the accused did not fall within the category of a public servant within the meaning of the term as used in Indian penal Code and the Indore Municipal Act.

( 3 ) HE, therefore, held that the accused could not be tried and convicted for an offence under Section 161, I. P. C. He further held that inasmuch as no offence under Section 161, I. P. C. could be made out against the accused, he could not try the accused under Section 420, I. P. C. , simpliciter. He, therefore, directed the complaint to be filed before a competent Magistrate. The police accordingly put up the. accused for trial before the Additional District Magistrate, Indore. It was contended on behalf of the accused there that in view of




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top