SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 45

NEVASKAR
STATE – Appellant
Versus
TARACHAND ANAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.D.PATEL, S.L.GARG

NEVASKAR, J.

( 1 ) ACCUSED Tarachand is being prosecuted for offences under Sections 406 and 420, Indian. Penal Code before the First Class Magistrate, Mhow. He applied for being exempted from personal appearance.

( 2 ) THIS prayer was initially rejected but the High Court of Madhya Bharat in criminal Reference No. 129 of 1951 granted exemption in the following terms:

"i would therefore direct that the exemption be granted to the accused on the ground that he lives at Dehradun and it would be very expensive and inconvenient for him to attend the Court at every time and grant him exemption throughout the trial. "

( 3 ) AFTER the case went back to the trial Court prosecution evidence was examined and the stage was reached when the examination of the accused under Section 342, Criminal P. C. was to take place. At that time it was urged on behalf of the state that the accused could not be examined through his counsel and that he ought to personally appear. The Magistrate rejected the contention in view of the terms of the order of the High Court in this very case. On revision the learned sessions Judge took the same view.

( 4 ) THE present petition is directed against that order.

( 5 ) T


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top