SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 106

NEVASKAR
LAXMINARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
RAM SARUP – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KRISHNA SARUP, NAOLEKAR

NEWASKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision-petition arises out of a suit filed on behalf of plaintiff Laxminaram s/o Tulsiram minor by his mother Anandibai as his guardian against defendants ramsarup and plaintiff's father Tulsiram under the following circumstances. There are two houses in Lashkar, which are said to be the ancestral property of plaintiff and his father. Plaintiff claimed half share in these houses. These two houses were mortgaged by plaintiff's father Tulsiram with defendant No. 1 Ramsarun and the money thus procured had been wasted for illegal and immoral purposes including gambling and not for the purposes of the family. The defendant Ramsarup later filed a suit and obtained a decree against Tulsiram and sought to sell the mortgaged property in execution of that decree. Plaintiff's case is that the decree obtained by Ramsarup was collusive and was intended to cause loss to his rights. A case was also set up in the alternative that there had been partition between him and his father Tulsiram and that the plaintiff was in possession as owner. The plaintiff prayed for the following relief on these allegations.

(1) The plaintiff is entitled to one half share in the property in













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top