SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 103

V.R.SEN, G.P.BHUTT
SOBHARAM TIKARAM – Appellant
Versus
RAJKUMAR MUNNALAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.SETH, M.R.BOBDE

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiff's appeal from the decree of the Court of Additional District judge, Sagar, dismissing civil suit No. 13-A of 1947 for possession.

( 2 ) THE appellants are the trustees of Digambar Jain Mahila Ashram, Sagar. The suit was for possession of a house situate in Katra Bazar, Sagar, and gold ornaments worth Rs. 13,282/8/-, which belonged to Kanchhedilal who died on 17th November, 1945. Rewaram, who died during the pendency of the suit, was the separated brother of Kanchhadilal. He transferred the property in dispute to the Digambar Jain Mahila Ashram by a registered deed of trust, dated 12th january, 1946, claiming to have inherited it from his deceased brother. The suit was based on the deed of trust executed by him.

( 3 ) THE suit was originally instituted against Manbai. On her death, during the pendency of the suit, her minor son Rajkumar and his certificated guardian chhotelal were brought on record as her legal representatives. Their defence was that Rajkumar was the legitimate son of Kanchhedialal through Manbai. She was a benekiva and was married to Munnalal in the year 1936. He, however, abandoned her and severed Ms marital ties. She then married Kanchhedi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top