SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 75

B.K.CHATURVEDI, M.HIDAYATULLAH
HITKARINI SABHA – Appellant
Versus
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF JABALPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.SETH, R.S.DABIR, S.C.UPADHAYAY

( 1 ) THIS is an application for revision against an order made by Shri R. D. Doongaji. Second Additional District Judge, Jabalpur, in Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 32 of 1956 on 13-12-1956.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are simple. Land was acquired by the Collector, and two claimants for the compensation money appeared before the Collector. One is the present applicant, the Hitkarini Sabha, a registered body running some educational institutions at Jabalpur, and the other is the non-applicant, the Corporation of the city of Jabalpur. The Collector assessed the compensation and apportion ed between the Sabha and the Corporation, awarding to the former a sum of Rs. 2,34,739/ -. On the day the award was announced, both the parties were present through their representatives and vouchers for payment to the Sabha and the corporation Were drawn up to he handed over to them. The Corporation did not accent the payment, their agent informing the Collector that instructions had to be obtained. The Sabha accepted the voucher and withdrew the money.

( 3 ) LATER, the Corporation accepted its share of the compensation money, though under protest. Under the terms of section 31 of the Land Acquis







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top