SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 130

B.K.CHATURVEDI, T.P.NAIK
STATE GOVERNMENT – Appellant
Versus
BHAWANESH KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.L.KHASKALAM, J.N.NAGARATH

( 1 ) THIS is an appal against the acquittal of the respondent Bhawanesh Kumar by the Magistrate, 1st Class, Kawardha, of offences tinder Sections 304-A and 338 I p. C. The charges on which he was tried were that he on or about the 13th january 1956 at Singhori village caused the deaths of Raheman Khan, sheonarayan and Jehan by doing a rash and negligent act not amounting t0 homicide (i. e. by driving vehicle no. M. P. B. 463 rashly and negligently and without a licence, which ultimately resulted in the death of the aforesaid persons)and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 304-A of the Indian penal Code and secondly on the same day at the same place caused grievous hurt to Sukhao by doing an act (driving truck No. M. P. B. 463) so fastly and negligently as to endanger human life or the personal safety of others and thereby committed an offence under Section 338 of the Indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) THE accused-respondent Bhawanesh Kumar is the Sub-Divisional. Officer (Electrical and Mechanical) at the Sarodha Head Works. As part of his official duty he has to attend to and test all the vehicles both heavy and light and to maintain them in proper running conditions. D. W




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top