SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 181

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
A. H. Khan, J.
GENERAL MANAGER, GWALIOR SUGAR CO. - Appellant
Versus
SRILAL - Respondents
Civil Ref. 3 Of 1956
Decided On : 10/09/1957

Advocates Appeared:
DEY, Shiv Dayal

The term "minor brother" in Section 2 (d) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, includes a minor uterine brother.

Headnote:

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT - DEPENDANTS - MINOR BROTHER - MEANING OF - UTERINE BROTHER INCLUDED - SECTION 2 (D) OF THE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT, 1923.

Fact of the Case:

A workman died due to injuries sustained in a boiler accident at his workplace. His uterine brother filed a claim for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the term "minor brother" in Section 2 (d) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, includes a minor uterine brother.

Issues: Whether a uterine brother is a dependant within the meaning of Section 2 (d) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 27 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which abolishes the distinction between full blood and half-blood relatives for the purpose of succession. The court also considered English case law, which interprets the term "brother" in gifts or wills to include both full blood and half-blood brothers.

Final Decision: The court held that the term "minor brother" in Section 2 (d) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, includes a minor uterine brother and allowed the claim for compensation.

A. H. KHAN, J.

( 1 ) UNDER Section 27 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Commissioner for compensation has referred this case to the High Court. The facts leading to this reference in brief are that Shrilal, a workman, in the Gwalior Sugar Co. Ltd. , debra, died on 23-1-1956 of the injuries he sustained when the Boiler of the company accidentally got burst. The Company admits its liability and has deposited Rs. 1500/-for being given to the heir of the deceased if any. A notification was published calling applications from persons who were the dependants of the deceased and entitled to compensation.

( 2 ) FIRST of all one Dhani Ram applied, but his claim was rejected by the commissioner. Thereafter, the present applicant Bhawani, a minor brother of the deceased under the guardianship of Chironji, put in his claim for compensation. From the evidence that was produced in this connection, it appeared that Bhawani was a uterine brother of the deceased Shrilal, i. e. , the mother of Bhawani and shrilal was the same, though they were begotten by different fathers. The question referred to the High Court is whether according to Section 2 (d) of the Workmen's Compensation Act a uterine brother is or is not a dependant? In other words does the term "minor brother" occurring in Clause (d) referred to above include a minor uterine brother also?

( 3 ) THE reference has been made because of a judicial conflict on the point. The lahore High Court in In re. Dependants of Kartar Singh, AIR 1931 Lah 752 (2) (A), has held that the term "minor brother" includes a consanguine minor brother. A consanguine brother is one where the father is the same but the mothers are different. In the present case the mother is the same though the fathers are different: In principle, a consanguine brother and a uterine brother stand on the same footing in that both are half-blood brothers commonly known as stepbrothers.

( 4 ) THE Rangoon High Court in a case reported in In re. Maung Kyan, AIR 1931 rang 173 (SB) 03), has taken a contrary view and held that the term "minor brother" does not include a minor half-brother.

( 5 ) THE Lahore High Court in coming to the conclusion that a "minor brother" includes a "consanguine brother" relied upon Section 27 of the Indian Succession act, which says that for the purpose of succession there is no destruction between those who are related to a deceased person by the full blood and those who are related to him by half-blood. The learned Judge of the Lahore High Court also referred to the principle of Mohammedan Law, according to which consanguine brother and sisters are classified as residuaries (heirs ).

( 6 ) THE Rangoon High Court held the view that the term "brother" in its primary sense means a brother of the whole blood and that in its secondary and extended sense it includes a brother of half-blood also. The Rangoon Bench also observed that the Workmen's Compensation, Act is a quasi penal statute and it should not receive a benevolent interpretation in the interest of those who are made beneficiaries under it.

( 7 ) AFTER giving my serious thought to the question, I agree with the view expressed by the Lahore High Court and hold that the term "minor brother" includes a minor uterine brother also. My reasons for the view are:

( 8 ) ACCORDING to the general principle as embodied in Section 27 of the Indian succession Act, 1925, the policy of the law seems to be to do away with the distinction between the full blood and the half-blood. At one time the trend of thought was to differentiate between the two and this caused much heart-burning in the family. But when the pendulum of thought swung towards socialism this artificial barrier between the two was borne down. The law now makes no distinction between brothers of the half-blood and brothers of the full blood and they stand on the same footing in matters of succession. It would be interesting to note that at one time according to English Law relations of half-blood we





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top