SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 166

B.K.CHATURVEDI
MOOLJEE SICKA AND CO. – Appellant
Versus
SARDAR NARHARSINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.R.MANDLEKAR, N.N.Pande

B. K. CHATURVEDI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiff's second appeal against a decree of the 2nd Additional District judge, Bilaspur, reversing the decree of the trial Court and dismissing the plaintiff's suit.

( 2 ) THE facts are that on 21-1-1949 at Bilaspur the plaintiff-firm through the manager delivered to the defendant No. 2, the driver of a truck of the defendant no. 1, one hundred and twenty bags of tendu leaves for transport to Gondia. It is admitted that Motiram (defendant No. 2) was authorised to enter into contracts on behalf of the defendant No. 1. It was agreed that the plaintiff would pay Rs. 3/8/per bag as the hire for the transport and Rs. 20/- were paid as advance on this account. The truck No. C. P. R. 578 of the defendant No. 1 left for Gondia loaded with 120 bags that very day, but the bags were never delivered at Gondia. At the rate of Rs. 16/- per bag, the bags of tendu leaves were worth Rs. 1920/- and a suit was filed by the plaintiff against the two defendants for Rs. 1940/-after a demand and after service of a notice.

( 3 ) THE suit proceeded ex parte against the defendant No. 2. Defendant No. 1, who is the respondent in this appeal, contested the suit mainly on t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top